February 2,
2006
Two more
Iranians were executed, yesterday, by the Islamic republic
regime accused of "Murder", "Kidnapping" and "Drug
Trafficking".
One of
these new victims of the barbarian mullahs' regime, who was
not identified, was hanged in public in the southern city of
Kerman. The second , named as Reza, was hanged in the
central prison in the northeastern city of Mashhad.
The Islamic
republic regime is known for using false labels, such as,
"Kidnapping", "Armed Robbery", "Murder", "Drug Trafficking",
"Spying" or "Banditism" in order to qualify some of its
exasperated opponents. Such policy helps its European, Asian
and S. American partners to justify the continuation of
their economic relations with a repressive regime vis-à-vis
their public opinions.
Three more executed in Iran
February 6,
2006
Three more
Iranians were executed, yesterday, after having been accused
of being "thugs" and for having "disrupted public security".
These public executions took place in the northeastern City
of Sabzevar.
The news
of the executions was reported by the official "Khorassan
Daily" but the names of these victims were not reveled.
Sabzevar
was the scene of several riots, which took place two years
ago, and it's believed that the three victims were in
reality exasperated Iranians who had stood up against the
Islamic regime's forces' use of brutality.
Tens were
injured or killed during the clashes which sparkled under
the motif of the Khorassan province's spilt between four new
administrative entities. Several public buildings were
damaged by protesters who retaliated to the brutal attacks
made by militiamen.
Public
executions, in Iran, are common as the theocratic regime
uses them in order to show to the population the
consequences of what can happen due to the expression of
their aspiration for a total change.
The
Islamic republic regime is known for using false labels,
such as, "Kidnapping", "Armed Robbery", "Murder", "Drug
Trafficking", "Spying" or "Banditism" in order to qualify
some of its exasperated opponents. Such policy helps its
European, Asian and S. American partners to justify the
continuation of their economic relations with a repressive
regime vis-à-vis their public opinions.
Courtesy of:
Daneshjoo
